Templar Chivalry requires opposing the Subversive Agendas of negative Secret Societies, exposes their deceptions using Truth, and serves to provide a Balance of Powers against tyranny. Without Chivalry, the same historical “Evil Agenda” has continued to be implemented, even into the modern era.
All “Subversive Movements” throughout approximately the past 1,500 years, including Feudalism, Fascism, Communism, and modern Globalism, were motivated, driven and implemented by exactly the same historical “Evil Agenda”, as developed and shared by negative Secret Societies, following all details of its philosophies, strategies and methods. This same Agenda has continued to be persistently promoted and progressively implemented into the modern era, even into the present day.
The proverbial “Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing”, the Biblical metaphor for Subversive Secret Societies
Precisely for this reason, the famous book by the early 20th century academic researcher Nesta Helen Webster, who was praised by Winston Churchill, was informatively titled: “Secret Societies and Subversive Movements” (1924).
The 5th century Bavarian “Black Nobility”, as a Pseudo-Merovingian Secret Society of “Secret Bloodlines” (of the “Son of the Gods” hoax), developed the “Feudalism” Agenda, a subversive movement for imposing oppression by manipulated crises and deception.
An 11th century Satanist Secret Society, also from Bavaria, adopted and repackaged that same Agenda, as the “Satanic Counter-Code” Agenda, a subversive movement for undermining the Code of Chivalry.
The 18th century Bavarian Illuminati, founded in Bavaria, continued and fully developed the most complete detailed version of that same Agenda, as the “Protocols of the Illuminati” Agenda, a subversive movement to infiltrate and destabilize countries to impose Fascism, Communism, and later Globalism.
The 20th century “Priory of Sion” hoax (using the adapted Pseudo-Merovingian “Secret Bloodline of Jesus” hoax, and making false claims to Templar heritage), was a French attempt to popularize and promote that same Agenda, as a subversive movement to support Communism and later Globalism, and to undermine the expected modern restoration of legitimate Orders of Chivalry.
The background and details of the Pseudo-Merovingian “Black Nobility” and “Priory of Sion” Secret Societies, and their “Secret Bloodlines” hoaxes, are presented in the Secret Societies Rejected by Templarism report.
(See details in the Secret Societies topic report here)
Documents of the historical record provide compelling evidence connecting four Secret Societies, all pursuing and advancing the same elitist Evil Agenda against humanity: (1) the 5th century Bavarian Black Nobility; (2) the 11th century Bavarian Satanists; (3) the 18th century Bavarian Illuminati; and (4) the 18th century Priory of Sion hoax.
Tracing the connections between those four Secret Societies reveals that while their claims are false, their Evil Agenda of subversive deception and manipulated destruction for oppressive control over all humanity is very real. Moreover, the connections prove that the very same Agenda has been used and continued by such Secret Societies throughout history to the present day.
The founders of the Merovingian Dynasty were “Kings of the Salian Franks”, an ancient people of northern coastal continental Europe under the 1st century Roman Empire, who merged with the Saxons in the 3rd century, and thereafter were considered purely Saxons ((Dr. John Haywood, Dark Age Naval Power: Frankish and Anglo-Saxon Seafaring, 1st Edition, Routledge (1991), 2nd Edition, Anglo-Saxon Books, Frithgarth (1999), p.28; Dr. Haywood is a Cambridge scholar of medieval history, and Fellow of the Royal Historical Society of Great Britain;)) ((Dr. Ulrich Nonn, Die Franken, Kohlhammer Books, Stuttgart (2010), p.82; Dr. Nonn was a Professor of Medieval History at University of Koblenz-Landau.)).
The 19th century French historian Emile Leon Gautier (1832-1897 AD), Archivist of the Imperial Archives and Chief of the National Archives in Paris, documented the activities of a Bavarian “Pseudo-Merovingian” Secret Society based upon claimed “Secret Bloodlines”.
Bavarian Black Nobility, illustration in the ‘Jewel Book of Duchess Anna of Bavaria’ manuscript, 1552 AD, in the Bavarian State Library
This formed the 5th century Bavarian “Black Nobility” (meaning illegitimate) which was the negative political faction surrounding, influencing and undermining the legitimate Saxon French Merovingian Kings. That faction later became known as the Bavarian and French “Mayencais” (in 1793 AD).
The historian Gautier identified this Pseudo-Merovingian Secret Society as the “Mayencais”, a self-styled “tribe” as a “race [bloodlines] of traitors”, which created “great division… [of] two civilizations… two different races”. Gautier described this conflict as the subversive “Feudalism” Agenda of that political faction versus the rest of humanity. ((Emile Leon Gautier, La Chevalerie (1883): Translated in: Henry Frith, Chivalry, George Routledge & Sons, London (1891), Chapter III, “Commandment IV”.))
This identification is confirmed by the London Encyclopaedia of 1839 AD, which defines the general term “Merovingian” as being associated with a “race of French kings”, using the word “race” five times ((Original Editor of Encyclopaedia Metropolitana, London Encyclopaedia, 1st Edition, Printed for Thomas Tegg, London (1839), Volume 14, “Merovingian Character”, “Merovingian Race”, p.306.)).
The Encyclopaedia Britannica of 1911 also describes the Pseudo-Merovingian political faction as a “race”, describing that “the Merovingian Kings displayed considerable energy, both in their foreign wars and in the numerous wars against one another in which they found an outlet for their barbarian instincts. … [H]ovever, the race began to decline”. ((University of Cambridge, Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, Encyclopaedia Britannica, New York (1911), Volume 18, “Merovingian”, p.172.))
In fact, the legitimate Merovingians were not a different “race” at all, but were of mainstream European Saxon ancestry. Thus, the “race” claim was merely a self-styled tribal description from the false “Secret Bloodlines” claim, adopted by the Bavarian Pseudo-Merovingian Black Nobility to artificially create an air of mystique, to support their ambitions of feudalistic power and control.
It is highly significant that no other royal lineages are referred to in historical records as a “race”, but only as a “royal house” or “royal dynasty”. This reveals that the self-styled description, of claiming to be a “race” when they are not, is a distinctive and identifying characteristic of the Bavarian “Secret Bloodlines” Black Nobility as a Secret Society.
Gautier further documented how this Secret Society created Feudalism as a system of control, imposing it by manipulation of manufactured crises and other deceptions:
“Feudalism, so disastrous to the Church and to the Good, was really inevitable in the midst of the terrible troubles of the 9th century. … Barbarism threatened to descend… upon the astonished world. It was then… that the weak entertained the very natural idea of seeking the protection of the strong; and, rallying round them, cried, ‘Defend us, defend us!’ Such was Feudalism.” ((Emile Leon Gautier, La Chevalerie (1883); Translated in: Henry Frith, Chivalry, George Routledge & Sons, London (1891), Chapter IV.))
The authoritative historian Gautier documented that an 11th century Satanic Secret Society of “the Mayençais, [a] race [bloodlines] of traitors” based in Bavaria, adopted the deceptive and oppressive strategies of the Feudalism Agenda, establishing a subversive movement opposing the Code of Chivalry (which Gautier dated to ca. 1066 AD).
‘Codex Gigas’, grimoire of a medieval Secret Society of Satanists, 12th century Latin Manuscript, Depicting the Devil as Satan
As a result, they created the “Satanic Counter Code” (ca. 1070 AD): “Thou shalt never be loyal to anyone; Thou shalt never keep thy word… Thou shalt betray and sell honest men; Thou shalt uphold Evil and abase [attack] the Good; Thou shalt ravish [exploit and rob] the poor and disinherit the orphan; despoil [rob] widows; dishonor the Church; Thou shalt lie without shame; and violate thine oaths.”
“Do not believe in anything. If you meet a good man, beat him. Do wrong, commit sin everywhere and anywhere. … Refuse all service towards Heaven; Make war upon all good people; burn towns, villages, houses, overturn the altars and the crucifixes. This is the true road of honor.” ((Emile Leon Gautier, La Chevalerie (1883); Translated in: Henry Frith, Chivalry, George Routledge & Sons, London (1891), Chapter IV, Part IV, “Commandment X”, p.72, p.74; Citing: “Gaydon: Chanson de Geste” (11th c).)) ((Gaydon: Chanson de Geste (Text 11th century, Manuscript ca. 1250 AD); Published in: Francois Guessard (Editor) & Simeon Luce (Archivist), Anciens Poetes de la France, Librairie A. Franck, Paris (1862), Volume 7: “Gaydon: Chanson de Geste”; Manuscript dating: “Preface”, p.xix.))
Another version of this same Agenda was documented as a “15th Century Protocol”, verified by British Museum scholars, as a letter from a Bavarian Secret Society to Feudal Lords in France in 1489 AD, presenting a protocol of subversive methods of destruction for elitist control, all by deception:
“Make your sons merchants, that little by little they may despoil [rob] the People of their possessions. … Make your sons doctors and apothecaries [pharmacists], that they may take away the People’s lives. … Make your sons canons and clerics [clergy] in order that they may destroy their Churches. … Arrange that your sons… always mix themselves up with the affairs of State, in order that by putting the People under your yoke [control] you may dominate the world… [and] you will reach the actuality of power”. ((Victor E. Marsden, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion (1921), 1st Edition, The Britons Publishing Society, London (1922), 2nd Edition, Liberty Bell Publications, Reedy, West Virginia (1930); “Introduction: A Fifteenth Century ‘Protocol’”, p.7; Letter dated 13 January 1489 AD, verified by British Museum scholars.))
One can see why such an Agenda requires having Secret Societies, because it is so inherently repulsive to humanity, that none could even speak such things among reasonable people in polite society, without being shamed and shunned. This is precisely why the Apostles of Jesus condemned “the unfruitful works of darkness… For it is a shame even to speak of those things which are done of them in secret.” (Ephesians 5:11-12)
In the 18th century, the infamous Bavarian Illuminati, founded in 1776 AD, adopted and fully developed all previous versions of the historical Agenda from past Secret Societies. The Illuminati continued that same “Evil Agenda”, as a subversive movement to infiltrate and destabilize countries to impose Fascism, Communism, and later Globalism.
“Bavarian Illuminati” Pendant (18th century), artifact of original symbolism of the secret society
The full text of the historical Agenda, in the most complete and detailed version called the “Protocols of the Illuminati”, came from a transcript of a private speech by the head of an international oligarch family, given to a Secret Society of oligarchs in 1773 AD ((William Guy Carr, Pawns in the Game, 1st Edition, National Federation of Christian Laymen, Gadsby-Leek Press, Ontario (1955): Transcript of speech given by the head of an oligarch family to a secret society of oligarchs in Frankfurt in 1773 AD (“Foreword”, p.i; Chapter 3, p.26; Chapter 9, p.94); Archived in Prince George B.C. Public Library in Canada; Carr was a Commander of the Canadian Royal Navy.)).
The “Protocols of the Illuminati” were first discovered in 1785 AD, intercepted when a courier from the headquarters of the Bavarian Illuminati was struck by lightning ((Adam Weishaupt, Apologie der Illuminaten (“Apology of the Illuminati”), Grattenauerischen Buchhandlung (“Grattenauer Books”), Frankfurt and Leipzig (1786), p.62, p.229; Archived in the Bavarian State Library.)) ((Abbé Augustin Barruel, Memoirs Illustrating the History of Jacobinism: The Antichristian Conspiracy, 2nd Edition, T. Burton, Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London (1799), Part 1: “The Antichristian Conspiracy”, Section: “Weishaupt’s Discourse for the Mysteries”, p.244.)) ((Herausgegeben von Jan Rachold, Die Illuminaten Quellen und Text zur Aufklarungsideologie des Illuminatenordens (1776-1785), Akademie-Verlag, Berlin (1984), p.363; Quoting Adam Weishaupt, Kurze Rechtfertigung Meiner Absichten (“Brief Justification of My Intentions”), Frankfurt and Leipzig (1787).)), causing the document to be seized by the police, who turned it over to the Bavarian government through a magistrate. This officially proved that it was already in active use as an Agenda by the Illuminati before that time. ((William Guy Carr, Pawns in the Game, 1st Edition, National Federation of Christian Laymen, Gadsby-Leek Press, Ontario (1955): “Protocols” discovered in 1785 AD intercepted from courier struck by lightning (Chapter 3, p.32).))
The Vatican documented that the Bavarian government outlawing the Illuminati in 1785 AD had caused its expansion in France ((Vatican, The Catholic Encyclopedia, Vol. 7, Robert Appleton Company, New York (1910), Hermann Gruber, “Illuminati: History”.)). This also caused its resurgence only 8 years later on the outskirts of Bavaria in 1793 AD as the “Mayençais”.
“Mayencais” was the French word for people of the Republic of Mainz, located on the northwest end of Bavaria (the southeast region of modern Germany), which officially existed only during the year 1793 AD. Mainz was the primary source of resistance against the French Revolutionary Army (which represented the People opposing elitist Feudal Lords), thus defending Feudalism.
‘Priory of Sion’ Fraternity Emblem Pendant ca. 1967
In the 20th century, the “Priory of Sion” hoax, a private fraternity registered in France in 1956 (and dissolved that same year), forged false documents to adopt the Pseudo-Merovingian “Secret Bloodline of Jesus” hoax, also making false claims to Templar heritage ((Jean-Luc Chaumeil, Rennes-le-Chateau – Gisors – Le Testament du Prieure de Sion: Le Crepuscule d’une Tenebreuse Affaire, Editions Pegase (2006).)) ((Ed Bradley, The Priory of Sion: Is The ‘Secret Organization’ Fact or Fiction? (27 April 2006), article from “60 Minutes” journalistic exposé, CBS News.)) ((Affaire Pelat: Le Rapport du Judge (8-14 January 1994), Le Point, No.1112, p.11; Philippe Laprevote, Note sur l’Actualite du Prieure de Sion, in Politica Hermetica (1996), No.10, pp.140-151.)).
This was used to deceive well-published amateur researchers to popularize false theories of pseudo-history ((Dominic Selwood, Knights Templar III: Birth of the Order (2013), historian for Daily Telegraph of London, article.)) ((Ed Bradley, The Priory of Sion: Is The ‘Secret Organization’ Fact or Fiction? (27 April 2006), article from “60 Minutes” journalistic exposé, CBS News.)), attempting to hijack and misdirect growing public interest in Templar Chivalry for itself, to prevent or undermine the expected modern restoration of legitimate Orders of Chivalry.
The fraudulent fraternity thus promoted the same historical “Evil Agenda” of elitist worldwide oppression over humanity, as a subversive movement to support Communism and later Globalism.
By continuing and serving the Agenda in this limited role, the deceived followers of this short-lived but widely known fraternity hoped to earn a place for themselves under the planned new tyranny of the Illuminati which they were voluntarily supporting.
%20Knights%20Templar%20Illuminated%20Letters%20www.knightstemplarorder.org.png)
Modern propaganda, promoted by Secret Societies themselves, has persistently attempted to dismiss the historical Agenda of the “Protocols of the Illuminati”, deceptively calling all copies of it since 1905 an alleged “forgery” or “fabrication”, supposedly based on a political satire book from 1864 AD.
Maurice Joly, Lawyer, Police and State Archivist, Secretary to Princess Mathilde of France, portrait photo ca. 1864 AD
However, this ignores the proven continuation of the same documented historical Agenda across over 1,300 years, from the 5th century Bavarian Black Nobility (ca. 457 AD), through 11th century Bavarian Satanists (ca. 1070 AD), and 15th century Bavarian Feudal Lords (in 1489 AD), to the 18th century Bavarian Illuminati (founded in 1776 AD) (as proven above).
This also ignores the proven facts, that the most complete and detailed text of that same Agenda was confirmed by four authenticated sources of matching texts, intercepted from the Bavarian Illuminati in 1785 AD, Italian Illuminati in 1818 AD, and French Illuminati in 1897 AD and 1901 (full evidence below).
The author of the satirical book exposing that historical Agenda, Maurice Joly (1829-1878 AD), specifically wrote in 1864 AD: “This book… has one precise goal: to personify one political system in particular that has not varied in its methods for a single day since the unfortunate… date of its inauguration.” ((Maurice Joly, Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu, A. Mertens and Son, Printer, Brussels (1864), “Modest Forward”, p.1.))
This clearly and uniquely identifies the Bavarian Protocols Agenda intercepted in 1785 AD (79 years earlier) and again in 1818 AD (46 years earlier), as the subject matter of the satire exposing its pre-existing methods.
Maurice Joly, dismissed by the propaganda as supposedly a mere “publicist”, was in fact a Lawyer of the Bar, a Library Researcher at the Ministry of Police, later an Archivist at the Ministry of State, and the Secretary to Princess Mathilde of France ((Maurice Joly, Son Passé, Son Programme, Par Lui-Même, LaCroix Verboeckhoven, Paris (1870); “Appointed Attaché to the Ministry of Interior [Police]” (p.5); “Secretary to Princess Mathilde” of France (p.5); “Library Researcher for the Ministry of State” for 10 years from 1849 AD (p.5); Completed “law studies” and “thesis for [law] license” becoming a Lawyer in 1859 AD (pp.5-6, p.8).)). He was thus highly qualified to find and analyze the documented Agenda which was already implemented over many centuries.
Title Page of the 1905 Nilus Edition, authenticated Russian translation of the full “Protocols of the Illuminati” Agenda
The authenticated Protocols of the Illuminati Agenda (from 1773 AD, discovered in 1785 AD) ((William Guy Carr, Pawns in the Game, 1st Edition, National Federation of Christian Laymen, Gadsby-Leek Press, Ontario (1955): Transcript of speech given by the head of an oligarch family to a secret society of oligarchs in Frankfurt in 1773 AD (“Foreword”, p.i; Chapter 3, p.26; Chapter 9, p.94); “Protocols” discovered in 1785 AD intercepted from courier struck by lightning (Chapter 3, p.32).)) matches another three copies of the same text, from three different sources, such that it is confirmed by a total of four authenticated copies:
Another authenticated copy of the same “Protocols” Agenda was intercepted in 1818 AD from a courier of the “Alta Vendita” Lodge of the Italian “Carbonari”, a Secret Society based on a surviving branch of the Bavarian Illuminati ((Michael Di Gargano, Irish and English Freemasons and their Foreign Brothers, M.H. Gill & Son, Dublin (1878), p.62.)) ((Fritz Springmeier, Bloodlines of the Illuminati, 1st Edition (1995), 2nd Edition, Ambassador House (1998), 3rd Edition, Pentracks Publications (2005); Chapter “Financial Wizards & Wealthy Cults”, Section “Co-Masters of the World”, p.118; Chapter “The Rothschilds”, Section “The Five Wizards”, p.142; Alta Vendita document “Permanent Instructions: Practical Code of Rules”.)).
Another two authenticated copies of the same “Protocols” were found, one edition as a book printed in Paris in 1897 AD (confirmed by the Russian Ministry of Police and agents of the Secret Police) ((Boris Fyodorov, Pyotr Stolypin’s Attempt to Resolve the “Jewish Question”, Research Report in Russian (25 July 2003), Part 4: “Stolypin as Minister of Internal Affairs [Police] appointed [to] investigate… [which] concluded” the Protocols “appeared in Paris… in 1897” (¶5); “Another official investigation… by the Chief of the Petersburg Secret Police… confirmed” the Protocols were published “in Paris in 1896-1900 [ca. 1897]” (¶9).)), and another edition as “documents stolen from… a secret meeting of the initiated in France” in 1901 ((Victor E. Marsden, Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion (1921), 1st Edition, The Britons Publishing Society, London (1922), 2nd Edition, Liberty Bell Publications, Reedy, West Virginia (1930); Inside Cover Text, p.3.)) ((Mikhail Menshikov, Plots Against Humanity, The New Times (“Novoye Vremya”) newspaper, “Letters to Friends & Family” (“Pis’ma k Blizhnim”) column, Saint Petersburg (April 1902).)).
This same “Protocols” Agenda, matching all four authenticated copies, was translated from French by Professor Sergei Nilus, a Russian Orthodox Priest, who published it in 1905 as the book entitled “The Great in the Small: The Antichrist as an Imminent Political Power” ((Sergei Nilus, The Great in the Small: The Antichrist as an Imminent Political Power, Orthodox Church Archives, Tsar’s Royal Court, Typography of the Tsar’s Committee of the Red Cross (1905).)).
The Nilus Edition was authenticated and preserved in the British Museum since 1906, and translated from Russian by the British investigative journalist Victor E. Marsden of the London Morning Post newspaper, who was appointed special correspondent of H.R.H. the Prince of Wales, and who published the first English edition of the Protocols in 1921. ((Victor E. Marsden, Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion (1921), 1st Edition, The Britons Publishing Society, London (1922), 2nd Edition, Liberty Bell Publications, Reedy, West Virginia (1930); Inside Cover Text, and “Introduction (1922)”.))
The Protocols of the Illuminati Agenda specifically evidences its direct connection with the Pseudo-Merovingian “Black Nobility” ((Victor E. Marsden, Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, (1921), 1st Edition, The Britons Publishing Society, London (1922), 2nd Edition, Liberty Bell Publications, Reedy, West Virginia (1930).)):
Protocol 14 plans to impose a new form of feudal “Serfdom”, through precisely the same methods used by the Pseudo-Merovingians throughout the 5th – 8th centuries to develop the Feudalism which they imposed in the 9th century, which became the modern “Neo-Feudalism” of corporate economic slavery.
Protocol 15 declares the method of relying on the “mysticism of authority”, using “the emblems of inviolability from mystical causes”, precisely as the 5th century Pseudo-Merovingians manufactured the “Son of the Gods” hoax (which they adapted as the 8th century “Secret Bloodline of Jesus” hoax), and as the 20th century “Priory of Sion” hoax promoted the same “Secret Bloodlines” hoax.
Protocol 24 states that descendants of the supposed “dynastic roots of King David”, referring to the Pseudo-Merovingian “Secret Bloodline of Jesus” hoax, would be the controllers of future Kings under a worldwide dictatorship.
The background and details of the “Pseudo-Merovingian” Secret Societies, and their “Secret Bloodlines” hoaxes, are presented in the Secret Societies report.
(See details in the Secret Societies topic report here)
Over recent centuries, many famous leaders and other authoritative experts have repeatedly and publicly warned of the reality of a Subversive Agenda by Secret Societies against humanity.
These periodic warnings confirmed the fact that this same historical Agenda not only persisted into the modern era, but has been systematically implemented throughout the past three centuries:
In 1864 AD, the French Lawyer and Archivist of the Police and Ministry of State, Maurice Joly, described the Protocols Agenda:
“[O]ne political system in particular… has not varied in its methods for one single day… intended to corrupt honesty itself; But public consciousness still lives, and the heavens will one day interfere in the games being played against it” ((Maurice Joly, Dialogues in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu, A. Mertens and Son, Brussels (1864), “Modest Forword”.)).
In 1920, the British Prime Minister Sir Winston Churchill published a statement, identifying the Protocols Agenda as a threat to the world by Secret Societies:
“[T]his world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence [Evil]… It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th century… [by] this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld [Secret Societies]” ((Sir Winston Churchill, Illustrated Sunday Herald, Article: “Zionism Versus Bolshevism” (February 1920).)).
In 1921, the American President Henry Ford in a newspaper interview, made the point that the reality of the Protocols Agenda is repeatedly proven by the fact that news headlines consistently show the Agenda being implemented:
“The only statement I care to make about the Protocols [Agenda] is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old [since the 1905 Nilus translation], and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it now.” ((US President Henry Ford, Interview in “World” Newspaper, New York (17 February 1921); Quoted and cited in: Victor E. Marsden, Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion (1921), 1st Edition, The Britons Publishing Society, London (1922), 2nd Edition, Liberty Bell Publications, Reedy, West Virginia (1930); Introduction, p.5.))
In 1925, the scholar Herjulf Vikingson concluded that the Protocols Agenda and its methods belong to the “Enemies of Humanity” ((Herjulf Vikingson, Introduction: The Secret World Government, Chicago (04 July 1925), in Maj.Gen. Cherep-Spiridovich, The Secret World Government or “The Hidden Hand”, The Anti-Bolshevist Publishing Association, New York (1926).)).
In 1956, the founding Director of the US Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI), J. Edgar Hoover, condemned the Protocols Agenda, described as follows:
“The truth is that the Global Tyranny of the 20th century… is infiltration… the Evil, which has been introduced into our midst… a philosophy, which must ultimately destroy all that is Good and decent… [by] proponents of atheistic materialism”. ((John Edgar Hoover, Communist “New Look”: A Study in Duplicity, The Elks Magazine: Grand Lodge Convention Report (August 1956), Cover feature illustration, Article at pp. 4-5, 45-48.))
In 1961, the American President John F. Kennedy warned about the Protocols Agenda being increasingly implemented in modern times:
“The very word ‘Secrecy’ is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently historically opposed to Secret Societies… Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe. … For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies… on infiltration… on subversion… on intimidation… It is a system… [of] political operations.” ((US President John F. Kennedy, Speech: “The President and the Press” (“Secret Societies” Speech), given to the American Newspaper Publishers Association, at the Waldorf Astoria Hotel in New York City (27 April 1961).))
Many key points of the Protocols of the Illuminati Agenda reveal damning admissions of its criminal intent, and fully explain its specific methods of implementation by subversion and deception. It also declares to its leaders that the Agenda is entirely self-destructive even for its own followers. These things are openly admitted in writing, in great detail, mostly because the Protocols were expected to be guarded under maximum secrecy. ((Victor E. Marsden, Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, (1921), 1st Edition, The Britons Publishing Society, London (1922), 2nd Edition, Liberty Bell Publications, Reedy, West Virginia (1930).))
The Protocols Agenda explicitly admits that it is knowingly and intentionally “Evil”. Despite justifying that Evil by superficial mention of some “greater good”, it admits that any such “good” is only for the Secret Societies themselves, at the expense and great suffering of all the rest of humanity:
Protocol 1.11 – Committing to immorality and deception in leadership: “The political has nothing in common with the moral. The ruler… must have recourse both to cunning and to make-believe.”
Protocol 1.23 – Declaring “Evil” by deception as a policy: “Violence must be the principle, and cunning and make-believe the rule… This Evil is the one and only means to attain the end… Therefore, we must not stop at bribery, deceit and treachery when they should serve towards the attainment of our end.”
Protocol 3.7 – Declaring genocide of humanity: “We always give support in accordance with an alleged brotherly rule… We are interested in just the opposite… the killing out of the People.”
Protocol 10.19 – Declares economic slavery imposed through crimes against humanity, by the plan “to utterly exhaust humanity with dissention, hatred, struggle, envy and even by the use of torture, by starvation… so that the ‘People’ see no other escape than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and all else.”
Protocol 15.9 – Referring to humanity as “cattle” to be “sacrificed” as their intentional “victims”: “It behooves not to stop at any means or to count the victims sacrificed… We have not counted the victims of the seed of the People’s cattle”.
Protocol 22.3 – Admits “Evil” for tyrannical control, and confirms “all that Evil which for so many centuries we have had to commit… [for] the bringing of everything into order… on the condition, of course, of strict observance of the laws established by us.”
Protocol 23.4 – Declaring that by destroying civilization the secret society will “erect on the ruins the throne of the King of the Illuminati.”
The Protocols specifically evidence a strategy of using the false mystique of deceptive pseudo-history to deflect blame onto positive institutions, by impersonating them with false claims to their heritage, including misuse of their legacy and sacred symbols:
Protocol 4.2 – Admits to misappropriating the image of positive organizations, which thereby “blindly serve as a screen for us and our objects, but the plan of action of our force, even its very abiding place, remains for the whole People an unknown mystery.”
Protocol 5.4 – Admits to falsely deflecting blame on legitimate positive chivalric and ecclesiastical Orders: “We have contrived to discredit them in the eyes of the unthinking mob as an overt organization, while we ourselves all the while have kept our secret organization in the shade.”
Protocol 15.3 – Planning to “confirm the aureole of power… by such a majestic inflexibility of might [which] shall carry on its face the emblems of inviolability from mystical causes. … The People do not lay on finger on him who hypnotizes them” by such mystique.
Protocol 22.4 – Planning false mystique to impose tyranny by force against all rights: “Our authority will be the crown of order… [to] inspire a mystical bowing of the knee before it… True force makes no terms with any right, not even with that of God.”
The Protocols Agenda itself admits that even its own supporters are actually marked for destruction:
Protocol 15.1 – Admits that the secret factions which “serve us and have served us, we shall disband and send into exile to continents far removed… In this way we shall proceed with those [collaborators] who know too much”.
Protocol 15.9 – “We execute [supporters] in such [a way] that none save the brotherhood [elite] can ever have a suspicion of it, not even the victims themselves of our death sentence. They all die when required”.
Protocol 23.4 – Declares that their supporters and agents will only serve “to erect on the ruins the throne of the King of the Illuminati; but their part will be played out the moment he enters into his Kingdom. Then it will be necessary to sweep them away.”
By the Agenda’s own written plans, those who are seduced by the philosophies of egotism and elitism, and motivated by false promises of implied rewards (for serving as Agents of negative Secret Societies, as the Minions of Evil) would be treated merely as disposable pawns on the chessboard of the Agenda.
Evil gives no reward – it only consumes and destroys everything it touches. As a result, all who choose to support this Agenda only condemn themselves to a predetermined “death sentence”, even (and especially) if their sabotage against humanity is successful.
Therefore, the historical Evil Agenda of Secret Societies is conclusively exposed as unsustainable, irrational, illogical, and arguably clinically insane.
Any and all individuals or organizations who choose to support the Agenda or any related Secret Societies are simply fools, blinded by egomaniacal ambitions, who thereby condemn themselves to self-destruction.
Meanwhile, however, humanity must rise up to defend itself against the real mass suffering caused by their delusional attempts.
The historical record proves that Secret Societies have written and declared a specific and detailed Subversive Agenda against humanity for over 1,500 years. Modern history proves that such societies have intensified and accelerated implementing that same Agenda during the past three centuries.
History thus proves that it is necessary for humanity to rise up, stand up for right over wrong, and demonstrate to all proponents and adherents of the Subversive Agenda, that the People refuse to be deceived, and refuse to allow evil-doers to violate God-given rights to impose elitist tyranny.
Fortunately, the Templar Order does not need to engage in any proverbial “Cloak and Dagger” conflicts with any Secret Societies, which is best left to their own inherent in-fighting.
The utter destruction of the Evil Agenda, to restore the freedom and prosperity of humanity, requires nothing more than promoting Wisdom, Truth and Justice. Victory for the forces of Good over Evil can be assured, by simply educating the general public to detect, expose, boycott and reject any and all who attempt to further that historically proven Agenda.
In this way, modern Templars can fulfill their traditional role as “Warrior Monks”, by serving as scholars and educators, shining the light of Truth to eradicate Evil as “information warriors”, with all of the same effectiveness as if by battle with swords and lances.
Learn about the Secret Societies rejected by Templar Chivalry.
Learn about the Real Enemies of the Order which Templars oppose.
Learn about the Evils of False Defamation as a primary Agenda method.
Learn about how the Code of Chivalry requires opposing Abuses of Power.
You cannot copy content of this page
